Yes I've done it a few times. The amount of cheats on here is absurd - a simple looks at your opponents stats will tell you if someone's cheating or not. I've found three only yesterday - users Akane_Akane, Loserichiban, and FrightTheKnight, who have absurdly high win:loss ratio's, and whose respective accuracies very, very rarely - if ever - fall below 97%. Magnus himself doesn't play at such high a standard. It's ridiculous.
I know that Lichess is opensource, volunteer, donation supported and all the rest of it, but really the amount of cheating puts me off using the site.
If I download software that wins for me, I don't win - the software does. So what is the point?
I know that Lichess is opensource, volunteer, donation supported and all the rest of it, but really the amount of cheating puts me off using the site.
If I download software that wins for me, I don't win - the software does. So what is the point?
@RamonBaharanda said in #12:
> Yes I've done it a few times. The amount of cheats on here is absurd - a simple looks at your opponents stats will tell you if someone's cheating or not. I've found three only yesterday - users Akane_Akane, Loserichiban, and FrightTheKnight, who have absurdly high win:loss ratio's, and whose respective accuracies very, very rarely - if ever - fall below 97%. Magnus himself doesn't play at such high a standard. It's ridiculous.
>
> I know that Lichess is opensource, volunteer, donation supported and all the rest of it, but really the amount of cheating puts me off using the site.
>
> If I download software that wins for me, I don't win - the software does. So what is the point?
news on the radio: "beware, there's a wrong-way driver..."
you on the motorway: "what, one? all of them!"
> Yes I've done it a few times. The amount of cheats on here is absurd - a simple looks at your opponents stats will tell you if someone's cheating or not. I've found three only yesterday - users Akane_Akane, Loserichiban, and FrightTheKnight, who have absurdly high win:loss ratio's, and whose respective accuracies very, very rarely - if ever - fall below 97%. Magnus himself doesn't play at such high a standard. It's ridiculous.
>
> I know that Lichess is opensource, volunteer, donation supported and all the rest of it, but really the amount of cheating puts me off using the site.
>
> If I download software that wins for me, I don't win - the software does. So what is the point?
news on the radio: "beware, there's a wrong-way driver..."
you on the motorway: "what, one? all of them!"
@indiachess2012 said in #1:
> PLEASE REPLY!!!
If presenting a valid account of one's experience, based on discernable factors of consequence to the game constitutes cheating, then: yes, I have cheated. Otherwise, no.
> PLEASE REPLY!!!
If presenting a valid account of one's experience, based on discernable factors of consequence to the game constitutes cheating, then: yes, I have cheated. Otherwise, no.
@Cedur216 said in #13:
> news on the radio: "beware, there's a wrong-way driver..."
> you on the motorway: "what, one? all of them!"
I've lost plenty of games fairly, but no-one in the world plays consistently at 97%+ accuracy.
You look like a decent player - rated around 1900, 600 or so wins, 400 or so losses. You certainly look like a stronger player than me, and I've no doubt you could absolutely tank me. But even your longest winning streak is *drumroll*.... NINE!!!! As opposed to Akane_Akane who, at my last count, was at 60. Unless the guy really is a secret GM, no-one in the world wins that much. Especially at this level.
> news on the radio: "beware, there's a wrong-way driver..."
> you on the motorway: "what, one? all of them!"
I've lost plenty of games fairly, but no-one in the world plays consistently at 97%+ accuracy.
You look like a decent player - rated around 1900, 600 or so wins, 400 or so losses. You certainly look like a stronger player than me, and I've no doubt you could absolutely tank me. But even your longest winning streak is *drumroll*.... NINE!!!! As opposed to Akane_Akane who, at my last count, was at 60. Unless the guy really is a secret GM, no-one in the world wins that much. Especially at this level.
@RamonBaharanda See my message. You are banned, so ALL your opponents are also banned.
lichess.org/appeal#help-root
lichess.org/appeal#help-root
97% accuracy over 71 moves. The persons record for 11th May? 51 wins, 3 draws!!!
Why is this person wasting their time here?
Yep many times
@Ericahhhhhhh said in #16:
> @RamonBaharanda See my message. You are banned, so ALL your opponents are also banned.
>
> lichess.org/appeal#help-root
I had no idea I was banned. It makes sense now that I play so many blatant cheats. But yes, I have appealed.
> @RamonBaharanda See my message. You are banned, so ALL your opponents are also banned.
>
> lichess.org/appeal#help-root
I had no idea I was banned. It makes sense now that I play so many blatant cheats. But yes, I have appealed.
I think people are like 400 rating and they almost give up chess and they search for best computer chess moves heres one www.nextchessmove.com/ and they magically be 2000+ and immediately get banned like so funny to watch
Nowadays I open analysis board and click engine (i am not cheating) and observe the opponents move
I once threatened someone who was like 1300 in chess.com that i will make him/her banned (it was a main acc)
I think he/she was 8 or 9 because he/she cant spell anything right and was trashtalking and was kinda making faces like UwU,TwT and OwO
Nowadays I open analysis board and click engine (i am not cheating) and observe the opponents move
I once threatened someone who was like 1300 in chess.com that i will make him/her banned (it was a main acc)
I think he/she was 8 or 9 because he/she cant spell anything right and was trashtalking and was kinda making faces like UwU,TwT and OwO
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.