#8 / JK Knight
I should try that again. Tried that on chesstempo, wasn't particularly thrilled by the results, but maybe i just encountered problems which weren't focusing on my blind spot.
I am looking at positional games at the moment, yes. My style is quite aggressive and dynamic, but I wanna add a silent and strategic way of approaching positions. This will serve many purposes such as improving my intuition, my stamina and patience as well as the quality of my play in general.
#9 / Sputnik Monroe
I don't think it's accurate to deploy this model on chess, since you're not a team when approaching a chess position but just one person.
Some argue that there is a correlation between a person's playing style and their character.
I agree to a certain extent, not being sure about my chess.
I guess, I have something of a plant, a monitor evaluator and a finisher. The latter, I think, possesses a paradox trait for being called a finisher.
Being a perfectionist often hinders you from coming to efficient solutions and you end up solving one issue very well but neglect the rest. I see a bit of that in play as well, since I often get into time trouble.
I hope my tactic example could give you an image of what I mean.
PS: Have you heard of the 16pf (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16PF_Questionnaire) ?
Also very interesting when it comes to personalities and chess.
Cheers!
I should try that again. Tried that on chesstempo, wasn't particularly thrilled by the results, but maybe i just encountered problems which weren't focusing on my blind spot.
I am looking at positional games at the moment, yes. My style is quite aggressive and dynamic, but I wanna add a silent and strategic way of approaching positions. This will serve many purposes such as improving my intuition, my stamina and patience as well as the quality of my play in general.
#9 / Sputnik Monroe
I don't think it's accurate to deploy this model on chess, since you're not a team when approaching a chess position but just one person.
Some argue that there is a correlation between a person's playing style and their character.
I agree to a certain extent, not being sure about my chess.
I guess, I have something of a plant, a monitor evaluator and a finisher. The latter, I think, possesses a paradox trait for being called a finisher.
Being a perfectionist often hinders you from coming to efficient solutions and you end up solving one issue very well but neglect the rest. I see a bit of that in play as well, since I often get into time trouble.
I hope my tactic example could give you an image of what I mean.
PS: Have you heard of the 16pf (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16PF_Questionnaire) ?
Also very interesting when it comes to personalities and chess.
Cheers!